What we found
Oregon lacks a comprehensive, centralized procurement and contracting compliance program.
DAS has the authority to perform compliance reviews of most state contracts but has not established a comprehensive, centralized compliance program to identify or prevent risky procurement and contracting decisions. As a result, DAS may not effectively identify or mitigate agency contracting issues that can lead to inefficient spending or noncompliance with regulations or even jeopardize program initiatives. Establishing a compliance function in Oregon is aligned with best practice and ensures public dollars are well spent.
DAS needs to improve customer service in its State Procurement Services program.
Agency survey respondents report the DAS State Procurement Services program does not provide consistent and high-quality customer service to state agencies. Respondents noted poor procurement training, outdated manuals and templates, inexperienced staff, and sluggish, sometimes conflicting communication from DAS. These challenges slow issue resolution and foster frustration and misunderstandings. Resolving these issues would support DAS’s intention to set and monitor high standards of accountability around state procurement.
OregonBuys performs most of its intended functions but does not capture all state spend.
OregonBuys is meeting many of its proposed goals. Most state agencies are now using the system and most of the functions proposed to the Oregon Legislature can be performed. However, OregonBuys does not capture all state spend, limiting DAS’s ability to make informed strategic sourcing decisions. State agencies also noted several persistent operational challenges, from difficulties with basic system navigation to burdensome testing requirements. In addition, OregonBuys does not support all necessary aspects of contract management. While not a function of OregonBuys, DAS should consider the benefits of implementing a contract lifecycle management system for itself and state agencies.